Driving at 70: What’s Being Proposed — and What Isn’t
If you’ve seen recent headlines about driving at 70, you’d be forgiven for feeling a bit uneasy.
Whenever age and independence appear in the same sentence, the noise often gets louder than the facts. That’s why I wanted to write this — to calmly explain what’s actually being proposed, what’s already the law, and what hasn’t changed at all.
This isn’t about scare stories. It’s about clarity.
What has been proposed
At the moment, drivers aged 70 and over renew their driving licence every three years by self-declaring that their eyesight is good enough to drive.
The government has proposed replacing that self-declaration with evidence of a recent eye test when renewing a licence at 70 and beyond.
That’s it.
- No proposal for a retest
- No automatic driving ban
- No change to how often licences are renewed
Nothing has changed yet. These are proposals under consultation.
If you want the official sources, here they are:
- Renew your driving licence at 70 (DVLA / GOV.UK)
- Consultation: mandatory eyesight testing for older drivers
- Driving eyesight rules (number plate test etc.)
What hasn’t changed
There is no requirement for drivers to retake a driving test at 70.
There is no new medical examination being introduced for ordinary car licences beyond what already exists.
If these proposals go ahead, the focus would be on eyesight, not driving ability.
Learner and new driver changes (briefly)
The same set of proposals also includes changes aimed at learner and newly qualified drivers, such as graduated licences and restrictions in the early years of driving. These are designed to improve safety at the other end of the age scale.
Driving rules have always evolved.
When I passed my test in the 1970s, there was no theory test — just a practical test and a few road signs. In my father’s day, you could practically drive up the road and do a three-point turn.
Attitudes to drink-driving have changed too. There was a time when having a pint and driving home felt normal. Today, the message is clearer — if you’re driving, it’s better not to drink at all.
A small personal aside
I remember sitting outside country pubs as a child. It always seemed to be summer: warm evenings, plastic chairs, a bottle of Coca-Cola and a packet of crisps.
Children didn’t go inside pubs back then — that just wasn’t a thing. The adults chatted, time slowed down, and nobody seemed in a rush to be anywhere else.
And here’s the strange thing… I can’t remember how children went to the toilet back then.
Did we just… not need to? Did we hold it for hours? Or did nobody worry about these things?
Today, we plan everything. Toilets. Parking. What we’ll drink. How we’ll get home.
Maybe nothing actually changed. Maybe we just noticed more. Or maybe childhood simply edited out the inconvenient bits.
What has changed for the better is how easy it is now not to drink. Non-alcoholic beers make it much easier to say no without being told “go on — you can have one”.
A separate issue: the C1 licence (not part of the new proposals)
This part often gets mixed up, so it’s worth being clear: C1 licence rules are not part of the new proposals. They are existing law.
If you passed your driving test before 1997, you may have what are often called “grandfather rights”. These can include a C1 licence, which allows you to drive vehicles up to 7.5 tonnes — including large motorhomes, vans, and even small lorries.
Many people don’t realise they have this entitlement until later in life, often when looking at campervans.
At age 70:
- You can keep C1
- But only if you pass a medical assessment
- There is no requirement to retake a driving test
Useful official sources:
A practical note on medical assessments
If you do need a medical assessment — for example, to retain a C1 licence — there are independent providers who offer these at reasonable prices. One example is D4Drivers.
I’m not affiliated with them — it’s simply useful information.
My personal view on “grandfather rights”
This is where opinion comes in — and reasonable people may disagree.
I’ve always felt there’s something slightly unfair about a system where someone can legally drive a very large vehicle purely because they passed a test decades ago.
If I were to drive a large motorhome — especially something around nine metres long — I’d actually prefer proper training and a practical test. Yes, it would cost money. But confidence and competence matter.
That doesn’t mean older drivers are unsafe. Far from it. It just means the rules don’t always reflect how vehicles — and roads — have changed.
The bigger picture
This isn’t about banning older drivers. It’s about understanding the rules properly, keeping independence, and separating facts from headlines.
Nothing has changed yet. But if changes do come, how they’re handled matters — because driving isn’t just about transport. It’s about confidence, freedom, and staying connected.
Watch the explainer video
Free guide: Still Got It — A Dummies’ Guide to ChatGPT (for the Over 60s)
If you’re curious about AI but don’t want jargon or hype, I made a simple step-by-step guide you can read over a cuppa.
Get the free guide here: Download / sign up
Related reading on SixtyRocks
- State Pension Delay Explained – What it means if you’re over 50
- Butlins Bognor at 60 – A surprisingly brilliant break
- Raising Twin Boys in My Sixties
Final thought
Getting older doesn’t mean losing independence — but it does mean the world around us keeps changing. Understanding those changes matters.
If you’d like more calm explanations about life after sixty, you’ll find them across SixtyRocks.co.uk.

